![]() ![]() The result of the annava F test two talis: (1) the learning method shows the main significant effect for the study result, F(1,56) = 158.680 p < 0.05 (2) the successful level shows the main significant effect for the study result, F(1,56) = 5.612 p < 0.05 (3) there was significant interaction between learning method and level of success of the is not significant interaction between learning method and successful level toward the study result, F(1,56) = 6.848 p<0.05. The test of achievment is conducted by objective essay test. The data of the studens’ success is collected through personality test which is adapted from Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS). The population of the students at SMK N 2 Samarinda at elevenh grade in the third semesters. The research uses quantitative approach by using factorial design post tes only. This research aims to: (1) find the difference of the students’ study result in the budget planning lesson between those who get integrated active learning and those who get convensional learning (lecturung, demonstration) (2) to find the difference of the study result in the budget planning lesson between high successful students and low successful students (3) to find the interaction between achievment level and learning method toward the study result. This research discusses the implementation of the integrated active learning by Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet in the Budget Planning Lesson to Count the cost of a house foundation. Key words: Active Learning, Integrative, Ms-Excel, House Foundation. ![]() Technology and Vocational Education Study Program, Post Graduate Program of State University of Surabaya.Īdvisor: (1) Prof.Dr.Kusnan, MT (2) Dr. ![]() Integrated Active Learning by Microsoft Excel (Spreadsheet) In the Budget Planning Lesson to Count the Cost of a House Foundation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |